By Sofia Williams
Editor-In-Chief
On Jan. 3 and 4, files that contain the names of over 100 people connected to Jeffrey Epstein, wealthy financier and convicted sex offender, were released online. The individuals mentioned in the nearly 950 pages of files, which precede the publication of more sealed documents in the coming weeks, were Epstein’s co-conspirators, victims, and associates. The files are part of a 2015 lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, who helped Epstein coerce his victims. While it is vital to hold Epstein and those associated with him accountable for their crimes, the use of the newly released documents as a political issue and subject of speculation undercuts the veracity of his culpability.
In the 1990s, Epstein began running his money-management business from the island of St. Thomas in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Epstein also owned the nearby island of St. James, a mansion in Manhattan, New York, and a private jet. At these locations, Epstein allegedly installed cameras and other surveillance systems to track the sex acts performed by his wealthy guests. The majority of these acts involved underage girls, many of whom were present due to coercion or force. Epstein was convicted of procuring a child for prostitution in 2008 and died in 2019, leaving many of his dealings shrouded in mystery.
The information housed in the sealed documents, while highly anticipated by online true-crime savants, has, for the most part, already been established and subject to media coverage since Epstein’s conviction. However, the theories and accusations that circulated online prior to the documents’ release precipitated misinformation regarding their contents. According to the Washington Post, Jimmy Kimmel threatened to sue Aaron Rodgers, quarterback for the New York Jets, for saying in an interview that Kimmel was one of the individuals named on the list. Shortly afterward, Kimmel sparked what would become a heated exchange with Rodgers on X, refuting his claim in a post that garnered 60 million views.
The sensationalist speculations sparked by the release of the files have caused misinformation to become increasingly common, especially in online spaces. Additionally, the often-incorrect postulations of internet users regarding the files draw attention away from the true issue at hand: the crimes that Epstein and his “clients” committed and their impact on his victims.
The hyperbolic internet rhetoric that preceded the release of the documents overshadowed the information that they contained, simply reinforcing already-held beliefs about Epstein’s dealings. The public’s energy would be better spent advocating for Epstein’s victims and others who are subject to sex trafficking and sexual abuse.
Beyond provoking misinformation, the files have been co-opted as fodder for political argument. Most notably, former U.S. President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s supporters have used the files as proof that former President Bill Clinton, who was rumored to have spent time with Epstein in the 1990s, used his wealth and connections to escape trial. According to the Washington Post, this alleged miscarriage of justice has served to reinforce Trump supporters’ mistrust of the court system, especially as Trump continues to face additional criminal charges. Advocates on the left have retorted by stating that Trump had also interacted with Epstein during the time of his most notorious crimes.
By politicizing the information in the files, U.S. citizens fixate on who is to blame, make hypotheses and create conspiracies surrounding Epstein’s infamous “circle.” However, since the files contain very little evidence to support these theories, it is more productive to lend support to Epstein’s victims and bring attention to similar issues that are occurring today. By supporting charities like Polaris and Human Aid International, individuals can work towards helping current victims of sex trafficking.
Many assert that closely scrutinizing the released files is important to bring Epstein’s conspirators to justice. While it is crucial to hold these individuals accountable, the documents do not present any new information that would defensibly support the majority of the outlandish accusations against such figures that are currently leveled in online forums.
Instead of extrapolating from the little information that is available about Epstein’s associates and using speculative claims as fuel for political debates, it is more important to focus on the safety of Epstein’s victims and others who have been affected by human trafficking.
Leave a Reply